Welding is an indispensable fabrication process for joining structural members in most engineering applications. However, because welding is fundamentally a localised thermal process, it strongly influences the structural performance of the welded component. The intense and non uniform heating associated with welding, followed by constrained cooling, introduces metallurgical changes and internal stresses that are not present in unwelded material.

When steel components are welded, their structural capacity is no longer governed solely by the properties of the base material. In particular, the fatigue performance of the structure becomes controlled by the welded joints. This is a safety critical issue when welded steel components operate under cyclic loading conditions, since fatigue failure typically initiates at weld locations.

For unwelded steel specimens, fatigue strength generally increases with increasing yield strength. However, once welding is introduced, the yield strength of the base metal has little or no influence on the fatigue strength of the welded structure, irrespective of joint type. This behaviour is well established and reflects the dominant role of weld geometry, stress concentration, residual stress, and defects in fatigue crack initiation. It is widely reported that approximately 80% of mechanical failures in engineering structures are fatigue related.

Fatigue strength is commonly defined as the resistance of a welded joint to the initiation and propagation of fatigue cracks. These cracks usually originate from regions of high stress concentration, such as the weld toe or weld root. One of the most influential factors that degrade the fatigue strength of welded joints is residual stress, particularly tensile residual stress.

Formation of Residual Stress During Welding

Residual stresses develop in welded joints primarily due to differential thermal expansion and contraction during the welding thermal cycle. As the weld metal is heated to the molten state, it expands freely. During cooling and solidification, the weld metal attempts to contract. This contraction is partially restrained by the surrounding cooler base material, resulting in the development of self equilibrating internal stresses even in the absence of external loading.

Two principal types of residual stress are commonly identified in welded joints: tensile residual stress and compressive residual stress. These stresses coexist in equilibrium, with one type arising to balance the other. In many structural steels, the magnitude of tensile residual stress in the weld metal and heat affected zone can approach the room temperature yield strength of the material.

Explanation of Residual Stress Orientation in Welded Joints

Residual stresses in welded joints are typically resolved into longitudinal and transverse components relative to the weld axis, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1.

The longitudinal residual stress acts parallel to the weld direction. It originates mainly from the longitudinal contraction of the weld metal as it cools from the molten state. Because this contraction is restrained by the surrounding base material, tensile residual stress develops along the weld centreline, while compressive residual stress forms further away from the weld to maintain force equilibrium.

The transverse residual stress acts perpendicular to the weld direction and arises from the transverse shrinkage of the weld bead and adjacent heat affected zone. This component is generally lower in magnitude than the longitudinal residual stress, but it is often more critical from a fatigue perspective.

Fig. 1 illustrates the typical distribution and magnitude of residual stresses in both directions. Tensile residual stresses are concentrated near the weld and heat affected zone, while compressive residual stresses develop in the surrounding base material. The stress profiles shown in the figure emphasise that residual stresses are not uniform but vary significantly with distance from the weld centreline.

Role of Residual Stress in Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation

The orientation of residual stress relative to potential crack planes is a key factor in fatigue performance. When a crack initiates at the weld toe, the transverse tensile residual stress is generally the most damaging component. This is because it acts normal to the crack plane and promotes crack opening in Mode I fatigue.

The transverse tensile residual stress effectively adds to the applied service stress, increasing the mean stress at the crack tip. This elevated mean stress increases the crack driving force and accelerates fatigue crack propagation. As a result, defects that might otherwise remain non critical can propagate rapidly to failure under cyclic loading. The combined effects of weld defects, geometric stress concentration, and residual stress significantly reduce the allowable load range that can be safely applied to welded structural members. For this reason, tensile residual stress is widely recognised as a limiting factor in the structural integrity and fatigue life of welded joints.

Influencing Factors and Engineering Implications

The magnitude and distribution of residual stress in welded joints are influenced by several factors, including the welding heat source, degree of mechanical restraint, joint geometry, temperature dependent material properties, thermal history, and solid state phase transformations occurring during cooling.

An understanding of residual stress orientation and its interaction with fatigue cracks, as illustrated in Fig. 1, is therefore essential for the design, fabrication, and assessment of fatigue critical welded structures. Effective residual stress management is a key requirement for ensuring long term structural reliability.

References

[1] Watanabe O, Matsumoto S, Nakano Y, Saito Y. Fatigue strength of welded joint of high strength steel and its controlling factor. Effects of stress concentration factor and welding residual stress. Yosetsu Gakkai Ronbunshu (Quarterly J Japan Weld Soc 1995;13:438–43.

[2] Ota A, Shiga C, Maeda Y, Suzuki N, Watanabe O, Kubo T, et al. Fatigue strength improvement of box-welded joints using low transformation temperature welding material. Weld Int 2000;14:801–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110009549271.

[3] Nose T, Okawa T. Approaches for fundamental principles 2: Total solution for fatigue of steel. 2012.

[4] Masubuchi K. Analysis and Control of Residual Stresses, Distortion and Their Consequences in Welded Structures. vol. 33. Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press; 1980.

[5] Fricke W. Effects of residual stresses on the fatigue behaviour of welded steel structures. Mater Sci Eng Technol 2005;36:642–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAWE.200500933.

[6] Ainsworth RA, Sharples JK, Smith SD. Effects of residual stresses on fracture behaviour – experimental results and assessment methods. J Strain Anal Eng Des 2000;35:307–16. https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324001514431.

[7] Francis JA, Bhadeshia HKDH, Withers PJ. Welding residual stresses in ferritic power plant steels. Mater Sci Technol 2007;23:1009–20. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328407X213116.

[8] Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH. Residual stress part 1 – Measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 2001;17:355–65. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101509980.

[9] Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH. Residual stress part 2 – Nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol 2001;17:366–75. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101510087.

[10] Coules HE. Contemporary approaches to reducing weld induced residual stress. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 2013;29:4–18. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000106.

[11] Leggatt RH. Residual stresses in welded structures. Int J Press Vessel Pip 2008;85:144–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.004.

[12] Colegrove P, Ikeagu C, Thistlethwaite A, Williams S, Nagy T, Suder W, et al. The welding process impact on residual stress and distortion. Sci Technol Weld Join 2009;14:717–25.

[13] Zerbst U. Application of fracture mechanics to welds with crack origin at the weld toe—a review. Part 2: welding residual stresses. Residual and total life assessment. Weld World 2020;64:151–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-019-00816-y.

[14] Orr S. Impeller Fatigue Assessment Using an S-N Approach. AMCA Int. Eng. Conf., Las Vegas, NV, USA: 2008.

[15] Masubuchi K. Analysis of welded structures : residual stresses, distortion, and their consequences. vol. 33. 1st ed. Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press; 1980.